Nick3069 wrote:
but to be honest, most of your nature watch videos are pretty boring.
I know some people think so.

But "boring" is of course not a universal constant.
Quote:
In most of them, the camera is too shaky,
Comes from being so zoomed in - necessary in order to be able to focus on such small scenes (as well as not disturbing the animals being viewed). I'm afraid tripods are usually out of the question; sometimes I accidentally find these scenes while I'm doing other things (such as my morning timelapse), and sometimes it's just not a situation where a tripod could be used - if only because the camera needs to remain mobile, and/or my carrying around of such a hulking object would hinder my ability to be unnoticed by the animals I'm observing. What
would be nice is a steadycam rig.. Matt knows how to make a simple one, but I've no time for that currently - and cold temperatures approach fast.
Quote:
the subject isn't doing anything interesting
Again, an opinion

but there are certainly more interesting things they
could be doing, in most cases. Sorry for not being able to direct them with my mind. ;P
Quote:
and you hear cars passing.
Argh, only in some of them, and then I think there are only 1 or 2 in which it's really noticeable. With the exception of the Eating Grasshopper vid, the cars are really not that close.. Noise pollution is uncool.
Quote:
I liked the Grasshopper though, the camera wasn't too shaky and it's feeding, something I've never seen a grasshopper do.
